Conduct

Conduct is relevant when the Court considers what Order to make on costs. Where a party has acted unreasonably they are unlikely to recover their legal costs even if they win the case.

When considering whether a party has acted unreasonably the Court specifically has to take into account the following conduct by a party:

the extent to which either party has followed any pre-action protocol or the Practice Direction (Pre-Action Conduct);
whether either party has unreasonably raised, pursued or contested any allegation or issue;
how each party has pursued or defended their case or a particular allegation or issue; and
whether a party who has succeeded in their claim, in whole or in part, exaggerated their claim.

What is unreasonable conduct can be very case specific. However, the Court of Appeal have made it clear that a refusal to mediate or attempt to settle a case is a relevant factor when assessing costs. In the case of Rolf v De Guerin [2011] EWCA Civ 78 the winning party had refused to mediate because they wanted their day in Court. The Court will not enter into speculation as to whether mediation may have been successful. Having won the case they were denied all of their legal costs.

Further Information: Interim Orders - The most common costs orders made at interim hearings; Final Orders - The most common costs orders made at trial; Automatic Costs Orders

We are here to help 24 hours a day 365 days a year. Either e-mail us anytime, call (01296) 662770 (Nick) or (01525) 373322 (Richard) during the normal working day or (07973) 424178 in an emergency.